It’s no secret that the first part Just Cause it was dull, monotonous and generally impressed few people. The authors came up with interesting ideas, but failed to develop them properly. This was a project that literally required us to entertain ourselves, while he himself disavowed only clone missions. And now, four years later, it hits the shelves Just Cause 2. The graphics have gotten better, old ideas have been developed… but the complaints are still the same. However, first things first. Live on StopGame.ru – video review of one of the most ambitious GTA-like games of recent years.
Just Cause 2
Best comments
Mega bomb game. The gameplay here is simply mind-blowing without exaggeration, the graphics are very cool for such an open world, the plot, although not so hot, but the briefing of each mission sets a decent incentive to play. Some tasks are simply done at the level of some MW2, taking into account only the fact that we do everything ourselves, and do not watch a scripted video. The humor in the game is also excellent, there were many moments when it was really funny. One example of this very humor is the news of the island of Panau (On which the game takes place) that we hear on the PDA, and in the game there are still a lot of reasons to laugh in the gameplay scenes. We can use a hook to connect any two objects, and believe me, there are simply a lot of combinations. For example, connect a statue to a car, then use this very machine to knock down the statue, attach, for example, its head and ride, fortunately the physics in the game are sane and everything looks believable, although this word can hardly be attributed to the game. Honor and praise to the developers for not striving for extreme realism, otherwise the gameplay would not have been so unique and stunning.
To: DarkH The most pleasant thing that I noticed while reading the comments (I seem to be the only one who always reads absolutely all of them) is the activity of the author of the text on the forum, if only all authors would contact us so often. =) Well, now about the review itself. The review was really nice to listen to, not because [quote]that’s how it turns out[/quote], and not [quote]because we’re cool[/quote] but because [quote]nya![/quote] yes, yes, this is exactly ^ the most important thing. Well, the author’s text and Gleb’s personal thoughts also play a big role. For some reason I wanted to attribute to you the principle of the proverb (or saying (decide for yourself)) “Whatever you call a ship, that’s how it will sail.”.", only here "As you write the text (Andrney) – that’s how they will read it (Gleb)" Well, now about your mess with Sandbox. Well, why bother entertaining us?? After all, it’s exactly the same here as in life. children come to play in the sandbox and don’t expect scripts to work. And they come and start inventing themselves. they want to build a castle.. they want to do some shit. they want to destroy everything. and comparison with GTA4 is a little inappropriate. there are some limitations in actions. and here is the awesome Zodro archipelago, where you can turn around much more recklessly. there would be a working tower))) P.S. Damn another great comment. question to the editor and more. At least it’s not in vain that I’m straining and typing such comments? X)
To: [strong]GoDDima[/strong] The graphics are excellent, https://sunny-wins.co.uk/withdrawal/ no doubt about it. I just don’t see the point in bowing to the game of legs for this. First of all, this is an action movie, it should have cool gameplay. And he’s cool here only for those who have a desire to fool around and blow something up. We praised agent missions, if you noticed. Next – how does the game justify the fact that it is a sandbox?? In the GTA IV you mentioned, it turned out to be an excellent sandbox, where there were interesting missions (by the way, there was constant access to them, so there was no need to entertain yourself) and a cool city that was tempting to explore. There is no such thing here. As for the disadvantages – we talked about the poor simulation of life in the article, there is no need to show it in the video. The same applies to bugs, which I, however, did not notice, and poor localization. Well, the rapidly changing weather is generally pure taste. To this “argument” I can simply answer that I was quite satisfied with the rate of weather change. I think the debate can end here. [img]http://forum.stopgame.ru/images/smiles/smile.gif[/img]
To: [strong]GoDDima[/strong] Technology may be moving (although the graphics in shooters are better than in Crysis in 2007), but the graphics in this tropical paradise are not so technologically advanced.For some reason, other, more technologically advanced games are installed on XP.And then you see, a pioneer in the form of Avalanche Studios was found, Microsoft decided to make a service, but at the same time the developers will lose a lot of people on PCs because of this decision.
[url=javascript:ins(’DarkH’);]To: DarkH[/url] Yes, we didn’t argue. D Judging by your “response” argument, the game tastes good. If you didn’t know, most players in GTA 4 do not complete missions, but play for their own pleasure, i.e.e. fool. Just Cause 2 is no exception. And it makes sense to compare the territory of GTA 4 and Just Cause 2? GTA 4 is a piece of land where they crammed all the most interesting things they could, and JC2 is a huge territory with both land and vast expanses of water. Here it is interesting to explore, for example, small islands, so that suddenly there is something interesting there. And the choice is up to the players – what they prefer. By the way, the game is full of bugs. There was even more in the demo version, it was completely fixed, but not everything. P.S. How could you not notice the localization?? A lot of players complain about unsynchronized voice acting! And how is it voiced?. [url=javascript:ins(’ProMasterDan’);]To: ProMasterDan[/url] I agree with the service to "small software" and the loss of PC users, but how else? Technology still needs to be promoted. In addition to products from small software, there are also video cards that users buy and want to squeeze out everything that the video card is capable of. Users must realize for themselves that although XP holds up, it’s worth trying something better. Crysis was (and is) a "heavy" game, so leaving only DirectX 10 would be stupid.
To:AiMka On Butler?Honestly, there’s not much in common.With the same success, Rico looks a little like the same Al Pacino at about 40.
I haven’t played the game, but the review, as always, is pleasing to the eye, and can you please tell me what kind of music is playing at the beginning)?
To: [strong]psixotrop94[/strong] Oh, the list of songs is at the end of all videos, please watch to the end.